One of my biggest problems in high school was that I wasn't all too unlike The Rock ("Stone Cold when you're with me" (in college)) gaining stardom who self-allegedly could not keep it in his pants. In plain words my comedy developed like his and like later mine own from combining two words together to make a funnier one so my favorite word at the end of high school was janky because I didn't have to ridicule myself for making it up --meaning not-all-pieces-all-too-un-make-shift able (double negative requisite).
A lot like zany, but I didn't have the rappaoire of true to the public's eyes a scholar's athleticism, keyword scholar as in scholastic and venerable. I was a brick house from the knees to shoulders, but not in and up around the neck face ears and hair like true dignitaries of today. Why try to be school prez? Prez with a z, when rape and pillaging executive orders seemed my alley, but closer to the truth was doing anything to be a delegate and get in high school chronicle-dom. Far right back then a thing too far from traditional relegates.
As soon as leaving high school, a target I became for the criminal justice activism and reach to be persecuted by group American psychology and law enforcement most chiefly official among other groups, movements, and societally driven pledges. Not to far off from bingeing manipulative lawyer jargon and court factors.
And what's with standards, factors, and jargon? Events like what would, aside from mere convincing, totally consume a person to want to see a player get injured (sentenced) or a team trounced from the arena (exiled)? Since the Roman coliseum age where people would go see brutality (I don't give a shit about Greek tales of sad catharsis or Germans laughing at sadness with their coined schaudenfraude), it just wracks my brain how this is akin or analogous to sitting through a trial to see papers shredded!
Not even an execution because that would be an overcompensation of legal action, but the rifling of papers as gamed stapling is some kind of coaching or ref action and in the end -- one side gets their whole argument shredded because to merely throw it in a bin, away, or in a briefcase is to waste tax payer money. Consequentially, you have a cohort of people who go to trials just to end the taxation (by seeing the shreds). The tax payers go along with it to the end where they can pull shreds out instead of their hair. Somewhat poised to witness defeat and its accompaniment of sheer looking down at hands in quizzacality is where pom poms come from (anything to boisterously send one off). Just take up some shreds and down with public taxation dollars!
Document
Exhibit
Arbitration
Indemnification for staff
Insolvency
Earmark
Directive
Injunction
Pro bono
Contracts
Expunge
Consumer rights
Memorandum
Class action
Objection
Contempt of court
Pardons
Having the floor
Standing
Honorable
Let the jury excuse what has just proceeded
Badgering the witness
Bully pulpit
Leading the witness
Argumentative
Neither here nor there
Possession is nine tenths of the law
Backing myself into a tent here
Raison d'etre
Recess
The (trial of the) ____court is now in-session
Jury ballotting
Bailiff
If it pleases the court,_____
Non disclosure agreement (NDA)
Fees
Public tax dollars
Take a/the stand
Overruled
Your Honor
Courthouse feasibility
Judge leniency
By-laws
Judge felony punishments reference guide
Settlement
Restitution
Stop payment
Jury of one's peers
Plaintiff vindication
Court costs
Bad faith
Rental agreement
Damages
Liabilites
Stenographer
Bottoming out
Blackmail
Blackballed
Way of the old European court judgement
Non-guilt verdict
Suit
Government appointed
Litigation
Certerioari
Trademark law
All rights reserved law
Capital infringement
International copyright
Tort law
Cruel and unusual punishment
Victims intendici
Not your aunties counsel
Conjecture speculation
Ex post facto law of statutes
De facto
Extremis ad infinitum
Habeus corpus
Corporeal punishment
Libel
A priori
Corollary
Appellate
Plea bargain (strengthened prosecution when judge sentencing power is reduced to being rigid)
Sentencing admonishment and last rite
Writ of
Double jeopardy
Insanity
Blameworthiness
Intent
Do no Harm
Contingency
Expound
Mistrial
Reasonable doubt
Prosecution plaintiff
Defendant defense
Indefatigable Laws for mistake prone (Judge Cardozo: unwise men)
Paternalism
Acrimony
Foreboding
Advocate
State child custody
Attorney at law
Surgeon general
U.S. solicitor general
Attorney general
Firm
Young associate to make partner
Jurisprudence
Expert Medical Diety MD
Custodian more empathy in place of psychiatrist to patient in psychiatrist office and one-on-one
Sword in mouth revelations book the last word from god
Claim will inheritance from family lawyer
Banks bailed out by government
Government not for the people, but for its laws
Gandhi deviated from his mentor who advised to kill the need to kill in killers
Comments
Post a Comment